Editorial Standards

Latest News Today maintains rigorous editorial standards. Our team verifies information from trusted sources and provides context to help readers understand complex stories.

Last Updated: Thursday, October 1, 2026 at 06:52 PM
Category: Id

Editor's Note

Latest News Today provides comprehensive coverage and analysis of breaking news stories. This article is part of our ongoing coverage of wbna29633608, bringing you verified information from trusted sources with added context and expert perspective.

Why This Matters: Understanding the full context of this story helps readers make informed decisions and stay updated on developments that impact our community.

Court: Oath not worth its cost in blood

The Fourth District Court of Appeal in Santa Ana agreed with a lower court on Tuesday when it ruled that a contract written in blood between two Korean businessmen is unenforceable.

A California appeals court says a blood oath is a waste of hemoglobin.

The Fourth District Court of Appeal in Santa Ana agreed with a lower court yesterday when it ruled that a contract written in blood between two Korean businessmen is unenforceable.

In October 2004, the two men were out drinking and one agreed to repay the other about $170,000 of an investment. The deal was written in blood on a piece of paper in Korean characters.

The translated note read: "Sir, please forgive me. Because of my deeds you have suffered financially. I will repay you to the best of my ability."

The friend who was owed the money sued to collect in 2006.

But a judge, and now the appeals court, ruled the claim was invalid and an "unenforceable promise."