Parent Stars Can Smother Planets

For a planet to be habitable, one parent star seems to be a better bet than two, especially if the stars are physically very close.

So concludes researchers who discovered what they believe to be the rocky remains of planets around three pairs of closely orbiting binary stars.

"It really only takes one rogue planet to have its orbit perturbed and that can wreak havoc on the whole system," Jeremy Drake, with the with Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Mass., told Discovery News.

Drake and colleagues found warm dust disks around sun-like stars that should have long ago dissipated any clouds of debris left over from their formative years.

"The fact that they're old, mature systems must mean that they've made the stuff relatively recently," said Drake.

Planets have been found in systems with two stars, but those stars' orbits are more stable. The type of binary stars targeted in the new study are located only about 2 million miles from their partners -- about 2 percent of the distance between the sun and Earth.

At that range, powerful magnetic fields and strong stellar winds slow the stars' spin, causing them to move even closer together over time. The resulting gravitational disturbances would impact any planets in tow and eventually cause the orbiting bodies to crash into one another.

Astronomers, who used NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope for their study, are hoping to get a more detailed look at the debris rings with another infrared observatory named Herschel. They also plan to develop computer models to better understand the destabilizing effects of the stars on any planets.

The discovery of these late-stage debris rings doesn't bode well for the existence of habitable planets in these systems, adds Drake.

For Subscribers

FOR SUBSCRIBERSAbdul El-Sayed tries to woo MAHA voters as Democrats seek inroads with RFK’s supporters

FOR SUBSCRIBERSKratom-like substances are popping up in a typically benign supplement

FOR SUBSCRIBERSGOP super PAC increases its spending for Sen. Jon Husted in tough Ohio race

FOR SUBSCRIBERSRecords reveal tumultuous marriage between slain New York Times executive and wife

FOR SUBSCRIBERSFrom clean energy warrior to ‘wall of shame,’ James Talarico reverses on a fossil fuel money pledge

FOR SUBSCRIBERSCongressional staff planned official trip with luxury stops in Italy and France weeks before election

FOR SUBSCRIBERSA harrowing ordeal aboard an Israel-bound plane

FOR SUBSCRIBERSOpenAI CEO Sam Altman to skip congressional hearing on rogue AI agents

FOR SUBSCRIBERSKey DOJ lawyers departed Trump ‘grand conspiracy’ probe amid pressure to produce, source says

FOR SUBSCRIBERSTrump’s new AI chatbot often links to a site launched under Clinton 26 years ago

FOR SUBSCRIBERSAt MAHA summit, industry CEOs the movement once vilified take the stage

FOR SUBSCRIBERSThis Paralympian has two goals: Win medals and give away $500,000 to her teammates

FOR SUBSCRIBERSCornell rape allegation spotlights stringent New York state laws that have long drawn criticism

FOR SUBSCRIBERSThe debate over AI’s future rages on both coasts

FOR SUBSCRIBERSDecades-old march dispute reignites in Northern Ireland, threatening political crisis

For Subscribers

FOR SUBSCRIBERSAbdul El-Sayed tries to woo MAHA voters as Democrats seek inroads with RFK’s supporters

FOR SUBSCRIBERSKratom-like substances are popping up in a typically benign supplement

FOR SUBSCRIBERSGOP super PAC increases its spending for Sen. Jon Husted in tough Ohio race

FOR SUBSCRIBERSRecords reveal tumultuous marriage between slain New York Times executive and wife

FOR SUBSCRIBERSFrom clean energy warrior to ‘wall of shame,’ James Talarico reverses on a fossil fuel money pledge

FOR SUBSCRIBERSCongressional staff planned official trip with luxury stops in Italy and France weeks before election

FOR SUBSCRIBERSA harrowing ordeal aboard an Israel-bound plane

FOR SUBSCRIBERSOpenAI CEO Sam Altman to skip congressional hearing on rogue AI agents

FOR SUBSCRIBERSKey DOJ lawyers departed Trump ‘grand conspiracy’ probe amid pressure to produce, source says

FOR SUBSCRIBERSTrump’s new AI chatbot often links to a site launched under Clinton 26 years ago

FOR SUBSCRIBERSAt MAHA summit, industry CEOs the movement once vilified take the stage

FOR SUBSCRIBERSThis Paralympian has two goals: Win medals and give away $500,000 to her teammates

FOR SUBSCRIBERSCornell rape allegation spotlights stringent New York state laws that have long drawn criticism

FOR SUBSCRIBERSThe debate over AI’s future rages on both coasts

FOR SUBSCRIBERSDecades-old march dispute reignites in Northern Ireland, threatening political crisis

"You could be lucky. You could be not. It is possible that a planetary system in a well evolved state could, over time, be driven to a destructive phase," he said.

NASA's Marc Kuchner, with the Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland, thinks planets orbiting farther from the parent stars would have a better shot at survival.

"The region near the stars is very unstable, but if you were to go far enough out I'd expect there'd be a large region of stability," Kuchner told Discovery News.

"On these planets, there would be two suns in the sky. At least one sun would be very luminous, highly variable and magnetically active, which might make the surface of the planet a hostile place. But on a planet with oceans, there could be happy sea creatures not too far beneath the protective water," he said.

The research appears in last week's issue of Astrophysical Journal Letters.