Editorial Standards

Latest News Today maintains rigorous editorial standards. Our team verifies information from trusted sources and provides context to help readers understand complex stories.

Last Updated: Thursday, October 1, 2026 at 05:02 PM
Category: Id

Editor's Note

Latest News Today provides comprehensive coverage and analysis of breaking news stories. This article is part of our ongoing coverage of wbna4806656, bringing you verified information from trusted sources with added context and expert perspective.

Why This Matters: Understanding the full context of this story helps readers make informed decisions and stay updated on developments that impact our community.

California Supreme Court sends right message to sleazy lawyers

Kudos to the California Supreme Court for forcing lawyers to evaluate whether they’re involved in silly or frivolous cases. The question the court faced was ic lawyers can be sued for malicious prosecution if, after they file a case, they learn their lawsuit is not “supported by probable cause.”

What this means is that if lawyers later figure out that they filed a frivolous lawsuit, do they have to stop? Might they have to pay? The court’s answer was 'yes.'

I support anything that forces lawyers to take some responsibility and  avoids allowing them to just say, "Well, I’m just representing my client...."  Of course, on the other side, some lawyers fought hard to avoid liability saying that this will lead lawyers to “second-guess their cases.”

What’s wrong with that?

This means California is now in the majority on this issue. Now it’s just time to start filing some cases and holding more lawyers responsible for wasting taxpayer dollars on time-consuming and harassing cases that only serve to embarrass the legal profession and clog our legal system.

Dan Abrams is the host of 'The Abrams Report.' on MSNBC.