Editorial Standards

Latest News Today maintains rigorous editorial standards. Our team verifies information from trusted sources and provides context to help readers understand complex stories.

Last Updated: Thursday, October 1, 2026 at 07:02 PM
Category: Id

Editor's Note

Latest News Today provides comprehensive coverage and analysis of breaking news stories. This article is part of our ongoing coverage of wbna5123113, bringing you verified information from trusted sources with added context and expert perspective.

Why This Matters: Understanding the full context of this story helps readers make informed decisions and stay updated on developments that impact our community.

Two guillty of ancient rock-art theft

Two men who removed 1,000-year-old Indian rock carvings from a national forest are convicted of theft of government property, but acquitted on other charges.

Two men who removed 1,000-year-old Indian rock carvings from a national forest and used some of the stones as lawn ornaments were convicted Wednesday of theft of government property.

They were acquitted of violating archaeological protection law.

John Ligon of Reno and Carrol Mizell of Van Nuys, Calif., insisted they did not know they were breaking the law, in part because no signs marked the site near Reno. They said they wanted to protect the etchings of a bighorn sheep and an archer from encroaching development.

Two of the three stolen rocks were found in Ligon’s front yard, where they had been placed as lawn ornaments.

David Houston, Mizell’s lawyer, said the split verdict shows the jury agreed the men were not “raiders of antiquities.”

To find the men guilty of theft of government property, the jury had to determine the property was worth more than $1,000. A Forest Service archaeologist testified the rocks’ archaeological value was at least $7,000, and a Washoe tribal leader said the etchings were “priceless.”

A guilty verdict on the charge of violating the Archaeological Resources Protection Act would have required proof that the men knew or should have known that the petroglyphs were valuable artifacts.

The theft charge carries up to 10 years in prison, the archaeological violation up to two years.