Editorial Standards

Latest News Today maintains rigorous editorial standards. Our team verifies information from trusted sources and provides context to help readers understand complex stories.

Last Updated: Thursday, October 1, 2026 at 05:58 PM
Category: Id

Editor's Note

Latest News Today provides comprehensive coverage and analysis of breaking news stories. This article is part of our ongoing coverage of wbna54100181, bringing you verified information from trusted sources with added context and expert perspective.

Why This Matters: Understanding the full context of this story helps readers make informed decisions and stay updated on developments that impact our community.

Court rejects Pennsylvania voter-ID law

"Voting laws are designed to assure a free and fair election; the Voter ID Law does not further this goal," McGinley wrote as part of his 103-page ruling.

"Voting laws are designed to assure a free and fair election; the Voter ID Law does not further this goal," McGinley wrote as part of his 103-page ruling.

Going into the 2012 election cycle, Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Corbett (R) and Republican state lawmakers created harsh, new voting restrictions, including a voter-ID law intended to prevent voter fraud. State officials later conceded they had literally no evidence that such fraud exists, but GOP policymakers imposed the new burden anyway.
 
Just five weeks before the elections, a judge put the voter-ID law on hold, ordering Pennsylvania not to enforce it while the legal proceedings continued. This morning, the state court took the next step and rejected the law on the merits.

A Pennsylvania judge has struck down the law requiring the state’s voters to show photo identification at the polls. Commonwealth Court Judge Bernard McGinley said the requirement that was the centerpiece of Pennsylvania’s embattled 2012 voter identification law places an unreasonable burden on the fundamental right to vote.

“Voting laws are designed to assure a free and fair election; the Voter ID Law does not further this goal,” McGinley wrote as part of his 103-page ruling.
 
He added that the law “unreasonably burdens the right to vote” and poses “a substantial threat” to hundreds of thousands of eligible Pennsylvania voters.
 
Witold Walczak, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania and one of the lead attorneys in the case, told the Pittsburgh Post Gazette: “Once the Commonwealth admitted they couldn’t identify any of the fraud supposedly prevented by the voter ID law, the act was plainly revealed to be nothing more than a voter suppression tool.”
 
Indeed, let’s not forget that Pennsylvania state Senate President Dominic Pileggi (R) boasted in the summer of 2012 that the Republicans’ voter-ID law, ostensibly about the integrity of the electoral process, “is gonna allow Governor Romney to win the state of Pennsylvania.”
 
The Corbett administration will, of course, appeal today’s ruling.
 
Update: Here’s the ruling (pdf).
 
Second Update: Rick Hasen has more, describing the decision as “a clear victory for opponents of voter id laws.”