The South Dakota Supreme Court ruled Monday on drunk driving cases in the state.Attorney general Marty Jackley announced that in the United States Supreme Court case of McNeely versus Missouri, warrantless blood draws will not work on previous drunk driving cases in South Dakota. The case specifically states that the natural process of alcohol in the bloodstream doesn't justify conducting a blood test without a warrant. However, the state Supreme Court will ultimately decide what effect the decision will have on the state's implied consent law.
Editor's Note
Latest News Today provides comprehensive coverage and analysis of breaking news stories. This article is part of our ongoing coverage of wbna55747996, bringing you verified information from trusted sources with added context and expert perspective.
Why This Matters: Understanding the full context of this story helps readers make informed decisions and stay updated on developments that impact our community.
SD Supreme Court Ruled on Drunk Driving Cases
The South Dakota Supreme Court ruled Monday on drunk driving cases in the state.Attorney general Marty Jackley announced that in the United States Supreme Court case of McNeely versus Missouri, warrantless blood draws will not work on previous drunk driving cases in South Dakota. The case specifically states that the natural process of alcohol in the bloodstream doesn't justify conducting a blood test without a warrant. However, the state Supreme Court will ultimately decide what effect the decision will have on the state's implied consent law.
/ Source: KNBN-TV














