Editorial Standards

Latest News Today maintains rigorous editorial standards. Our team verifies information from trusted sources and provides context to help readers understand complex stories.

Last Updated: Thursday, October 1, 2026 at 04:52 PM
Category: Id

Editor's Note

Latest News Today provides comprehensive coverage and analysis of breaking news stories. This article is part of our ongoing coverage of wbna7149634, bringing you verified information from trusted sources with added context and expert perspective.

Why This Matters: Understanding the full context of this story helps readers make informed decisions and stay updated on developments that impact our community.

Ebbers jury still undecided after fifth day

The jury at the trial of former WorldCom chief Bernard Ebbers deliberated for a fifth day Thursday and asked to review two documents that did not exist in evidence.

The jury weighing the case against former WorldCom chief Bernard Ebbers examined a new document Thursday but failed to reach a verdict in its fifth day of deliberations.

Jurors, in a late-morning note, asked to see a WorldCom management budget report from March 2002 and an internal revenue document called MonRev for the first quarter of 2002.

U.S. District Judge Barbara Jones told the panel there was “no such document” that applied to their first request. To the second, she noted that MonRev was a monthly, not quarterly, report.

Later, the jury clarified that it wanted to see MonRev reports for January, February and March of 2002. The judge told jurors only March existed, and provided them the document.

Jurors will return Friday to consider the fate of Ebbers, 63, who is charged with fraud, conspiracy and false filings in the $11 billion accounting fraud that sank WorldCom in 2002. It emerged from bankruptcy as MCI Inc.

On Wednesday, jurors asked whether they had to consider certain “supplemental allegations” against Ebbers, such as the size and scope of the fraud, in order to convict him of filing false regulatory documents.

Jones told the jury they did not need to consider those supplemental allegations.