Editorial Standards

Latest News Today maintains rigorous editorial standards. Our team verifies information from trusted sources and provides context to help readers understand complex stories.

Last Updated: Thursday, October 1, 2026 at 06:53 PM
Category: Id

Editor's Note

Latest News Today provides comprehensive coverage and analysis of breaking news stories. This article is part of our ongoing coverage of wbna9795309, bringing you verified information from trusted sources with added context and expert perspective.

Why This Matters: Understanding the full context of this story helps readers make informed decisions and stay updated on developments that impact our community.

Report: Texas overpaid Miers in 2000 land sale

Texas officials paid Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers’ family more than $100,000 for a small piece of land in 2000 — 10 times the land’s worth — despite the state’s objections to the way the price was determined, Knight Ridder Newspapers reported Saturday.

Texas officials paid Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers’ family more than $100,000 for a small piece of land in 2000 — 10 times the land’s worth — despite the state’s objections to the way the price was determined, Knight Ridder Newspapers reported Saturday.

The three-member committee that determined the price included Peggy Lundy, a friend of Miers, and property-rights activist Cathie Adams, Knight Ridder reported. They were appointed to the panel by state District Judge David Evans, who had received at least $5,000 in campaign contributions from Miers’ law firm.

The land in question was part of a parcel in west Dallas owned by Miers’ mother, Sally; Harriet Miers had the authority to represent her mother’s interests. Texas needed the northeast corner of the parcel to build an interstate highway off-ramp.

According to Knight Ridder, the land — which was part of a large Superfund pollution cleanup site — was valued at less than 30 cents a square foot. But the panel recommended paying nearly $5 a square foot for it.

The price was later reduced from $106,915 to $80,915, but Miers has yet to return the $26,000 difference to the state, said the story by Jack Douglas Jr. and Stephen Henderson.

“Nothing indicates that Miers sought out the judge or engineered the appointments to the panel, but there’s also no indication that she reported the potential conflicts of interest in the case or tried to avoid them,” the story said.

It quoted an unidentified White House spokesperson as saying that Miers considers the case a “straightforward condemnation matter” and did not know the details of her law firm’s donations to Evans.